When I was grocery shopping yesterday, I was stopped in my tracks in the kernel department by these packages of CHICKEN PAWS. They are, of course, chicken feet, not paws, and most people abjure them no count what they ’ re called ?. But I like chicken feet, chiefly when they ’ re cooked chinese style with black beans, ginger, and soy sauce .
But of path I wondered about the “ hand ” bit. Chickens don ’ thyroxine have paws, but feet and wings. I figured there were only two possible reasons for calling these “ paw ” :
a. It was a jest, possibly with the humor injected to make people buy them, or
b. It was a euphemism to make people less tolerant to buying something labeled “ chicken feet ”. When I take people to dim total and regulate chicken feet, most of my guests, disgusted, won ’ t even try them. Often the cause seems to be that the feet spent their ( short ) lives walking around the farmyard. ( actually, they scantily walk, as the poor beasts are confined in cages. ) Yes these same people eat eggs with gusto, and we know where testis come from !
well, a bit of Googling showed that there ’ s some confusion about “ feet ” versus “ paws ”. For case, the locate temper Advice, citing a USDA locate that doesn ’ t exist, says this, giving a photograph :
The chicken paw on the left field does not have adenine a lot of the lower branch as the chicken foot on the mighty .
While the difference may seem subtle to many people, it ’ s obviously very important to consumers in China :
Most premium elephantine paws are sold in sweeping markets and finally make their room into high-end restaurants. Smaller hand, chicken wings, and wing tips, in addition to being sold at sweeping markets, end up at besotted markets and process plants, which use them in finished food products .
The market for chicken feet is more varied than that of premium wimp paw ; larger chicken feet are sold to both sweeping and retail markets and are more normally used for family consumption ( and in barbecue stores ), small feet are typically promote cooked in serve plants. chinese consumers in the Northwest and Northeast tend to favor chicken feet over chicken paw .
This implies that there is a department of agriculture distinction between wimp paw, which have more leg, and chicken feet, which barely have the “ fingers ”. But some people like “ elephantine paws ” better than “ chicken feet ” ! Go figure .
But the USDA itself says this :
Are “poultry feet” and “poultry paws” the same?
Published 03/13/2007 09:47 AM | Updated 04/03/2018 09:54 AM
The area requirements provide requirements for domestic fowl feet but this plant produces poultry paw – are the requirements the lapp ?
No standard of identify exists for either poultry feet or domestic fowl paws. FSIS Directive 6210.2, which outlines production procedures for poultry paw to make the product eligible for the marker of inspection uses the term “ poultry feet ” entirely. If the plant is following 6210.2, and using the product name “ [ domestic fowl ] paw, ” they should be able to defend the function of that identify according to diligence standards. For determination of eligibility for export, the terms “ paw ” and “ feet ” would be regarded as the like product .
The FSIS directive link doesn ’ thyroxine work, either, but I found it at this site and, certain enough, it doesn ’ triiodothyronine note “ poultry paw ” ( the four-page directive tells inspectors how to inspect domestic fowl feet ) .
But Moe ’ south Meats says this :
What ’ s the deviation between chicken feet and chicken paws ? They [ wimp paw ] are alike to chicken feet except they do not contain character of the lower leg. They literally are only the foot ( aka paw ) of the wimp. This means they will contain less glucosamine and collagen than chicken feet, but are even a good choice for pets .
So the dispute appears to be an unofficial but conventionally sympathize distinction between the two “ preparations ”. “ Paws ” are equivalent to “ mittens ” that cover the hands and not the lower arms. Remember that the future meter you ’ ra looking for chicken feet ( I bet only at most 0.1 % of readers buy them ) .
hush, as a cranky biologist I object to the use of the word “ paws ” to refer to the pedal extremities of bird. Why not “ short feet ” and “ long feet ” ?
